News: Latest More than 52000 members


DigitalConsumer home


What we're all about


Recent news about your rights

Get Active

How you can participate

Q & A

Frequently asked questions and their answers

Bill of Rights

The Consumer Technology Bill of Rights

For the Press

Information for members of the press


Get in touch with us


Our privacy policy

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.
New: Subscribe to our news updates by using our RSS feed. Send problems or questions to
Feb 28, 2005

Some articles from the past few days:

Courts question anti-piracy rule: “The US broadcast regulator has been told by appeal judges it has “crossed the line” with an anti-piracy tag which stops programmes being copied.” More here.

Off The Shelf notes that you pay orders of magnitude more for violating copyright than for stealing a physical item. (In a somewhat related story, you pay more for indecent material on the airwaves than you do for dumping toxic waste in the river.)

Happily, Lexmark’s DMCA aspirations are all but dead: “The company’s request for a re-hearing of their case against North Carolina-based Static Control Components (SCC) has been denied.”

Via BoingBoing, an article on artists’ earnings and copyright: “Only a small minority of artists reaches ordinary living standards from copyright income… If an artist wants to include a sample from another record, major rights holders often insist on a controlling interest of 50 to 100 percent of the rights in the new track.”

Feb 28, 2005

Nice connection between two concepts that are on my mind a lot lately: Long Tail vs. Lessig.

What you need to encourage this multiplicity of commercialization potential is tiered alternatives to one-size-fits-all copyright, from allowing derivative works (good marketing!) to shorter terms for the sake of the remix-culture social good.

We’ve been talking about the long tail (and situated software and other stuff) at JotSpot for a few months now. It’s good to see people thinking about how to make the long tail consistent with the copyfight.

News archives: